valence
Practice
EquilibriumNational 2025

At high temperatures, solid calcium carbonate (M = 100.09) is in equilibrium with solid calcium oxide and carbon dioxide gas. CaCOX3(s)⇌CaO(s)+COX2(g)\ce{CaCO3(s) <=> CaO(s) + CO2(g)} Into an evacuated 30.0 L chamber maintained at 1200 K is introduced 3.0 g solid CaCOX3\ce{CaCO3}. After the system is allowed sufficient time to equilibrate, the pressure is 0.10 bar. What will the total pressure be at equilibrium if an additional 3.0 g CaCOX3\ce{CaCO3} is added to the chamber?

14% of national qualifiers got this right

Explanation

draft

Check whether the first sample actually reached true (heterogeneous) equilibrium.

At equilibrium, K=PCO2K=P_{CO_2} (both solids have activity 1), so as long as some solid CaCOX3\ce{CaCO3} remains, the equilibrium pressure is fixed by KK regardless of how much CaCOX3\ce{CaCO3} is present.

Compute the moles of CO2CO_2 actually present at P=0.10 barP=0.10\text{ bar}:
nCO2=PVRT=(0.10 bar)(30.0 L)(0.08314 L⋅bar/mol⋅K)(1200 K)=0.0301 moln_{CO_2}=\frac{PV}{RT}=\frac{(0.10\text{ bar})(30.0\text{ L})}{(0.08314\text{ L·bar/mol·K})(1200\text{ K})}=0.0301\text{ mol}

Compare with the moles of CaCOX3\ce{CaCO3} originally added:
nCaCO3=3.0 g100.09 g/mol=0.0300 moln_{CaCO_3}=\frac{3.0\text{ g}}{100.09\text{ g/mol}}=0.0300\text{ mol}

These are essentially identical — all of the original CaCOX3\ce{CaCO3} decomposed to reach 0.10 bar, meaning no solid CaCOX3\ce{CaCO3} remained. The system was limited by the amount of reactant, not by the true equilibrium constant KK. Therefore the measured 0.10 bar is not the equilibrium partial pressure of CO2CO_2; it's just an upper bound (the true KK must be ≥0.10\ge 0.10 bar).

When more CaCOX3\ce{CaCO3} is added, there may (or may not) be enough solid remaining at equilibrium to fix PCO2=KP_{CO_2}=K. Since we don't know the actual value of KK (only that K≥0.10K\ge0.10 bar), we cannot calculate the new total pressure from the given data.

Answer: (D) — the information given is insufficient to determine the new pressure.

A

Assumes the first trial reached genuine equilibrium with leftover solid CaCOX3\ce{CaCO3}, so K=0.10K=0.10 bar is fixed and adding more solid can't change PP. This ignores the check showing all the original solid was consumed, so 0.10 bar was not actually the equilibrium value.

B

Comes from an incorrect 'averaging' or square-root manipulation of the pressure/mole relationship (e.g., treating P2∝P^2\propto total moles of CaCO3CaCO_3 decomposed), a made-up scaling law with no thermodynamic basis.

C

Assumes CO2CO_2 production scales linearly with the mass of CaCOX3\ce{CaCO3} added (like a stoichiometric, non-equilibrium reaction going to completion), doubling the pressure to 0.20 bar — but equilibrium pressure of a gas in a solid-solid-gas equilibrium doesn't depend on the amount of solid present once true equilibrium is reached.

D

Correct: checking the numbers shows the first sample fully decomposed (no leftover solid CaCOX3\ce{CaCO3}), so 0.10 bar is not the true equilibrium pressure; the actual KK is unknown, so the new pressure cannot be calculated.

Concept · Heterogeneous equilibrium — solid completely consumed vs. true equilibrium

USNCO 2025 National Part I exam, question 34. © American Chemical Society; reproduced for non-commercial practice.